<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Caffeine and Calories</title> <atom:link href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=caffeine-vs-calories</link> <description>Ideas, issues, knowledge, data - visualized!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Stretch</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-49307</link> <dc:creator>Stretch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:44:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-49307</guid> <description>This introduces a pleasingly ritaoanl point of view.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This introduces a pleasingly ritaoanl point of view.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ernest</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-35525</link> <dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-35525</guid> <description>At the cafe where I work, we put four shots of espresso into a twenty ounce Americano, which I believe is standard, although different shops and different tastes will determine the strength.If you assume the 4 shots of espresso in a 20oz drink and you take the 300mg from the StarBucks figure, a single shot of espresso from there would contain 75mg of caffeine.Also, EnergyFiend says that a shot is 1.5 ounces.  That&#039;s actually a double shot, since most places pull their shots a little short to intensify the flavour and viscosity of the espresso.  You should also read the updated data that they got from Australia.On a side note, if you think that Starbucks tastes great, please check out a local roaster or cafe that uses small-batch roasts.  You&#039;ll be amazed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the cafe where I work, we put four shots of espresso into a twenty ounce Americano, which I believe is standard, although different shops and different tastes will determine the strength.</p><p>If you assume the 4 shots of espresso in a 20oz drink and you take the 300mg from the StarBucks figure, a single shot of espresso from there would contain 75mg of caffeine.</p><p>Also, EnergyFiend says that a shot is 1.5 ounces.  That&#8217;s actually a double shot, since most places pull their shots a little short to intensify the flavour and viscosity of the espresso.  You should also read the updated data that they got from Australia.</p><p>On a side note, if you think that Starbucks tastes great, please check out a local roaster or cafe that uses small-batch roasts.  You&#8217;ll be amazed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ernest</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-35524</link> <dc:creator>Ernest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-35524</guid> <description>agreed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ric Dragon</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-20896</link> <dc:creator>Ric Dragon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 13:49:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-20896</guid> <description>Love your visualizations. This one has me scratching my head, though (maybe too early in the morning? ) - But I don&#039;t understand the correlation between caffeine and calories.  Does caffeine intake burn calories?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your visualizations. This one has me scratching my head, though (maybe too early in the morning? ) &#8211; But I don&#8217;t understand the correlation between caffeine and calories.  Does caffeine intake burn calories?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JF</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-13781</link> <dc:creator>JF</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:34:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-13781</guid> <description>I love your work!!! This graph needs Mountain Dew though. :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your work!!! This graph needs Mountain Dew though. :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-9488</link> <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:28:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-9488</guid> <description>Not sure how a long black can have more caffine &amp; calories that a double shot esspreso, as a long black is a double esspreso with added hot water 9does the water contain caffine &amp; calories?)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how a long black can have more caffine &amp; calories that a double shot esspreso, as a long black is a double esspreso with added hot water 9does the water contain caffine &amp; calories?)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-9369</link> <dc:creator>William</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:04:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-9369</guid> <description>This is great.  Always helpful for reinforcement of the concept that espresso does not have &quot;more caffeine&quot; than coffee.  Water that moves through grinds at 15psi does NOT pick up caffeine like american drip coffee does.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great.  Always helpful for reinforcement of the concept that espresso does not have &#8220;more caffeine&#8221; than coffee.  Water that moves through grinds at 15psi does NOT pick up caffeine like american drip coffee does.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: christmas giftsÂ Â </title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-3305</link> <dc:creator>christmas giftsÂ Â </dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:21:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-3305</guid> <description>If I consider the axis are labeled &quot;caffeine&quot; and &quot;calories&quot;, the diagram should only used the first quadrant of a two dimensional graph. This design is counter intuitive since there aren&#039;t negative values of caffeine or calories.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I consider the axis are labeled &#8220;caffeine&#8221; and &#8220;calories&#8221;, the diagram should only used the first quadrant of a two dimensional graph. This design is counter intuitive since there aren&#8217;t negative values of caffeine or calories.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gerulf</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link> <dc:creator>Gerulf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:17:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-1647</guid> <description>Interesting, now I can clearly see what gives the most bang for the &quot;buck&quot;.
What energy drink to you refer to, I&#039;d be very interested.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, now I can clearly see what gives the most bang for the &#8220;buck&#8221;.<br
/> What energy drink to you refer to, I&#8217;d be very interested.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john</title><link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/caffeine-vs-calories/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link> <dc:creator>john</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:46:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=100#comment-1525</guid> <description>The scales should be at left and lower margins. As is, they create arbitrary quadrants and miss the chance to embphasize the point (0, 0).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scales should be at left and lower margins. As is, they create arbitrary quadrants and miss the chance to embphasize the point (0, 0).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.011 seconds using apc
Object Caching 395/403 objects using apc

Served from: www.informationisbeautiful.net @ 2012-02-09 22:22:28 -->
