
Volte face! I take back every moan I’ve emitted about The Guardian’s treatment of data. Especially now the Reduce Your Chances Of Dying In A Plane Crash image won their visualisation competition.
MY LOVELY BOOKS!
Information Is Beautiful
Hardback UK version. Out NOW!. Order.
The Visual Miscellaneum: A Colorful Guide To The World's Most Consequential Trivia"
Out in the US.Order.
-
Recent Posts
- Win 5 Signed Copies Of Information Is Beautiful!
- Haiti Earthquake: Who’s given what?
- Photographers Rights In The UK
- What makes a successful online dating photo?
- Great Visualizers: Mike Deal charts The Beatles
- What Does China Censor Online?
- Win Signed Copies of the Visual Miscellaneum!
- Climate Change: A Consensus Among Scientists?
- Four Infographic Morsels 3
- The Climate Deniers vs The Consensus
- The Billion Pound o Gram
- The Visual Miscellaneum: Errata
- Is the H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccine Safe?
- Afghanistan: The Information Is Not Beautiful
- 2012: The End Of The World?
Archives
Topics
Flickr
Check out my scrapbook on FlickrQUICKLINKS
- WIN 5 signed copies of Information Is Beautiful in its hardback gorgeousity. http://bit.ly/cZjENW Just join FBook group http://bit.ly/9Bk7XS 1 day ago
- Haiti Earthquake: Who's given what? And why we should keep an eye on those pledges. http://bit.ly/a0KI0J 1 week ago
- For those asking how to make infographics, I've started a little series on my process. Enjoy! Hope you find it helpful. http://bit.ly/9Hcnr2 1 week ago
- Your rights if you're stopped by the authorities for taking photos (UK) http://bit.ly/86Mfdj Our new handy, wallet-sized infosheet #phnat 2 weeks ago
- Mysteriously unsmiling, holding an animal http://bit.ly/6F5Djs What makes a successful online dating photo? 2 weeks ago
- FYI "Positive Thoughts" in the China censorship image is a Falun Gong pose 3 weeks ago
- New viz: What does China censor online? http://bit.ly/4WC755 3 weeks ago
- That's a nice one http://bit.ly/6FrniG (Pink Flloyd timeline) 3 weeks ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Blogroll
-
Feeds


7 Comments
Is this a Adobe Illustrator work? or what Progamm did you used for this diagramm
I m very interested in data visualisation but i only know Illustrator for this work.
Yes, it’s Illustrator. Amazing program.
There are factual errors in these charts. Qantas has not had “11 fatal accidents”, in fact Qantas has a near-perfect safety record. The wikipedia info you reference in that chart in fact refers to -incidents- only, not necessarily fatalities or crashes. In fact, if you click on the flight number of the last two Qantas incidents on the list, you’ll see they were serious incidents, but not crashes, and niether involved fatalities. Your charts are very pretty and informative, but I’ll be taking them with a grain of salt from now on as this clearly indicates you accept charts on wikipedia at face value, and fail to do even the most cursory of fact checking.
I wonder how that first chart should be interpreted. Given the title alone, the US and Britain would appear to be most risky, but it is visualizing absolute numbers of accidents rather than an accident rate. Perhaps it would be useful to include a denominator (number of flights or another appropriate metric).
@saddened, where does the graphic show that Qantas had 11 fatal flights? I don’t see it (which probably says a lot about my ability to extract info from such graphics).
The denominator would be passenger-mile. This would also reflect the much higher volumes of pax air travel in the United States compared to any other country in the world. Bottom line is that the U.S. is the safest for air transport on that basis, with Europe not far behind. Asia and Latin America are far riskier.
@darran I edited the image, based on visitor comments, correcting the error. That’s why Quantas is no longer showing.