<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Left vs Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/</link>
	<description>Ideas, issues, knowledge, data - visualized!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:12:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shedoon</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-11004</link>
		<dc:creator>shedoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-11004</guid>
		<description>Inspired by its clarity I have set this as my desktop background and am organising my icons accordingly...so my tax return stuff - all to the left. My business stuff to the right. And consequently I&#039;m going to let my desktop tell me what kind of person I am. If this is any sort of way of judging WHAT I DO rather than WHAT I THINK then it turns out I am more right than I thought even though my heart leaps to the left. Brilliant work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspired by its clarity I have set this as my desktop background and am organising my icons accordingly&#8230;so my tax return stuff &#8211; all to the left. My business stuff to the right. And consequently I&#8217;m going to let my desktop tell me what kind of person I am. If this is any sort of way of judging WHAT I DO rather than WHAT I THINK then it turns out I am more right than I thought even though my heart leaps to the left. Brilliant work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-10729</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-10729</guid>
		<description>&quot;Left-right&quot; is an ILLUSION that was originally woven during the French revolutionary era.  Democrats are NOT COMMUNISTS.  That is why they&#039;re called Democrats.  There is a COMMUNIST PARTY.. Why the hell put that in there?  This map is a total distortion.  Seriously.  left-right, only exist in your mind.  You have a left hand and a right hand.  As far as ideologies go, &quot;left-right&quot; is an abstract.  You might as well say that Republicans believe in &quot;God&quot; and Democrats worship &quot;Satan&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Left-right&#8221; is an ILLUSION that was originally woven during the French revolutionary era.  Democrats are NOT COMMUNISTS.  That is why they&#8217;re called Democrats.  There is a COMMUNIST PARTY.. Why the hell put that in there?  This map is a total distortion.  Seriously.  left-right, only exist in your mind.  You have a left hand and a right hand.  As far as ideologies go, &#8220;left-right&#8221; is an abstract.  You might as well say that Republicans believe in &#8220;God&#8221; and Democrats worship &#8220;Satan&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Mage</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-10110</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Mage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-10110</guid>
		<description>I agree with the commenters who point out that &quot;conservatives&quot; interefere with the lives and rights of individuals in a more agressive and offensive way than &quot;liberals&quot; do. Both have their share of statist and interventionist behaviors. In America, the Republican Party lost all credibility whe claiming a philsophy of individual liberty and fiscal responsibility a very long time ago. The government gets bigger and more powerful regardless of the party nominally in power, but the largest deficits and most outrageous assaults on the constitution can be claimed by repuplican regimes.

Conservatism was pronounced dead over forty years ago by none other than Ayn Rand, perhaps the only true philosopher the right in America has ever had. Conservatives still have the gall to quote her and claim her as their own.

There is a more important axis, a &quot;vertical&quot; one if you will, authoritarian vs. libertarian. This axis cuts across the spectrum of nominally &quot;leftist&quot; and &quot;right-wing&quot; groups. The true dominant ideology Global Corporatism is a fusion of authoritarian right and left ideologies, and in the end has no ideology other than the memetic/viral pathology of power.

&quot;Left&quot; and &quot;Right&quot; are illusory distinctions used for purposes of dividing and ruling:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/785757/industrial_psychology_the_evolution.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Industrial Psychology:  A Global Control System&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1378133/i_lived_in_a_totalitarian_socialist.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; I Live in a Totalitarian Socialist State&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the commenters who point out that &#8220;conservatives&#8221; interefere with the lives and rights of individuals in a more agressive and offensive way than &#8220;liberals&#8221; do. Both have their share of statist and interventionist behaviors. In America, the Republican Party lost all credibility whe claiming a philsophy of individual liberty and fiscal responsibility a very long time ago. The government gets bigger and more powerful regardless of the party nominally in power, but the largest deficits and most outrageous assaults on the constitution can be claimed by repuplican regimes.</p>
<p>Conservatism was pronounced dead over forty years ago by none other than Ayn Rand, perhaps the only true philosopher the right in America has ever had. Conservatives still have the gall to quote her and claim her as their own.</p>
<p>There is a more important axis, a &#8220;vertical&#8221; one if you will, authoritarian vs. libertarian. This axis cuts across the spectrum of nominally &#8220;leftist&#8221; and &#8220;right-wing&#8221; groups. The true dominant ideology Global Corporatism is a fusion of authoritarian right and left ideologies, and in the end has no ideology other than the memetic/viral pathology of power.</p>
<p>&#8220;Left&#8221; and &#8220;Right&#8221; are illusory distinctions used for purposes of dividing and ruling:<br />
<a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/785757/industrial_psychology_the_evolution.html" rel="nofollow">Industrial Psychology:  A Global Control System</a><br />
<a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1378133/i_lived_in_a_totalitarian_socialist.html" rel="nofollow"> I Live in a Totalitarian Socialist State</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rpeg</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-10035</link>
		<dc:creator>Rpeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-10035</guid>
		<description>The chart seems quite biased. It states that liberals vote for &quot;fairness.&quot;

Was there ever a more vague use of the word? What a liberal would deem &quot;fair,&quot; a libertarian would deem outrageously unjust. Affirmative action is considered &quot;fair&quot; by liberals, but such preferential treatment violates the very core of Martin Luther King&#039;s dream, doesn&#039;t it? There is no such thing as &quot;reverse-racism;&quot; only racism. 

For instance, the new &quot;hate crimes&quot; legislation effectively creates thought-crimes. If you were to make a decision to randomly punch the next person who passed you, you had better hope they are not a minority, because, regardless of any intent, people&#039;s rights and protections are NOT equal under the left. If the left truly wanted equality, they would be satisfied with the laws that punish attacks on all people, without regard to race, creed or gender. Such measures of TRUE fairness and parity do not interest those who only seek to construct a newer, smarter Big Brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart seems quite biased. It states that liberals vote for &#8220;fairness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Was there ever a more vague use of the word? What a liberal would deem &#8220;fair,&#8221; a libertarian would deem outrageously unjust. Affirmative action is considered &#8220;fair&#8221; by liberals, but such preferential treatment violates the very core of Martin Luther King&#8217;s dream, doesn&#8217;t it? There is no such thing as &#8220;reverse-racism;&#8221; only racism. </p>
<p>For instance, the new &#8220;hate crimes&#8221; legislation effectively creates thought-crimes. If you were to make a decision to randomly punch the next person who passed you, you had better hope they are not a minority, because, regardless of any intent, people&#8217;s rights and protections are NOT equal under the left. If the left truly wanted equality, they would be satisfied with the laws that punish attacks on all people, without regard to race, creed or gender. Such measures of TRUE fairness and parity do not interest those who only seek to construct a newer, smarter Big Brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left vs Right: A View of the Political Spectrum &#171; Battle Bunny</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-9896</link>
		<dc:creator>Left vs Right: A View of the Political Spectrum &#171; Battle Bunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-9896</guid>
		<description>[...] chart I saw awhile back on one of my favorite sites, Information is Beautiful. It&#8217;s called Left vs Right: A View of the Political Spectrum by David McCandless and information artist Stefanie Posavec, taken from my book The Visual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chart I saw awhile back on one of my favorite sites, Information is Beautiful. It&#8217;s called Left vs Right: A View of the Political Spectrum by David McCandless and information artist Stefanie Posavec, taken from my book The Visual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-9392</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-9392</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree that the interference in social lives is much heavier on the conservative side...I understand that liberals tend toward regulation and public programs that may affect the individual, but the conservatives are much more invasive.  Controlling elections, wiretapping, filling up prisons...that seems like a fairly steep influence on a citizen&#039;s life.  They want total control over what people can say, what they can do (i.e. victimless crimes), what they can believe (church/state not so separate), what they can achieve (keeping the rich rich and the poor poor), and the list goes on.  I don&#039;t see how liberals, with a live and let live philosophy, can hardly be said to interfere in our social lives more than the average conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree that the interference in social lives is much heavier on the conservative side&#8230;I understand that liberals tend toward regulation and public programs that may affect the individual, but the conservatives are much more invasive.  Controlling elections, wiretapping, filling up prisons&#8230;that seems like a fairly steep influence on a citizen&#8217;s life.  They want total control over what people can say, what they can do (i.e. victimless crimes), what they can believe (church/state not so separate), what they can achieve (keeping the rich rich and the poor poor), and the list goes on.  I don&#8217;t see how liberals, with a live and let live philosophy, can hardly be said to interfere in our social lives more than the average conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 200 CREATIVE AND INTERESTING INFOGRAPHICS [PICS]</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-8967</link>
		<dc:creator>200 CREATIVE AND INTERESTING INFOGRAPHICS [PICS]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-8967</guid>
		<description>[...] The Left Wing vs. Right Wing World [source] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Left Wing vs. Right Wing World [source] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattM</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-8555</link>
		<dc:creator>MattM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-8555</guid>
		<description>Brilliant diagram, but do 78% of European lefties believe in God? I find that astonishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant diagram, but do 78% of European lefties believe in God? I find that astonishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-8406</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-8406</guid>
		<description>Nice artwork, but totally flawed. The reality is the chart should be labeled &quot;Statist&quot; vs &quot;Individualist.&quot; The Left are elitists and Statists who think that they should be in charge of an enlightened State that can perfect human nature. They are utopian and backwards looking (proceeding Forward into the Past towards the next socialist dictatorship, with the best of intentions in their hearts), trying to create something that can never be. They believe in communitarianism and shallow egalitarianism (aka &quot;some animals are more equal than others&quot;). Their vision is as old as Plato&#039;s Republic. 

The Individualists are meritocrats who think that human nature is flawed and cannot be perfected, so the best form of government is that which governs least yet empowers the individual. They believe in individual responsibility, equal opportunity and meritocracy.
How&#039;s that for some counter stereotypes??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice artwork, but totally flawed. The reality is the chart should be labeled &#8220;Statist&#8221; vs &#8220;Individualist.&#8221; The Left are elitists and Statists who think that they should be in charge of an enlightened State that can perfect human nature. They are utopian and backwards looking (proceeding Forward into the Past towards the next socialist dictatorship, with the best of intentions in their hearts), trying to create something that can never be. They believe in communitarianism and shallow egalitarianism (aka &#8220;some animals are more equal than others&#8221;). Their vision is as old as Plato&#8217;s Republic. </p>
<p>The Individualists are meritocrats who think that human nature is flawed and cannot be perfected, so the best form of government is that which governs least yet empowers the individual. They believe in individual responsibility, equal opportunity and meritocracy.<br />
How&#8217;s that for some counter stereotypes??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/left-vs-right/comment-page-3/#comment-6222</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=714#comment-6222</guid>
		<description>First off: Amazing chart, and like yours, my opinions come from both sides (sometimes on the same topic!) which just goes to show...

And thanks for telling me that apparently in Switzerland red is associated with the right... I honestly didn&#039;t notice and here I was thinking I am a politcally interested Swiss... For me, red associates more closely with communism and socialism and therefore the left. Especially as our Social Democratic Party is almost truly socialist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off: Amazing chart, and like yours, my opinions come from both sides (sometimes on the same topic!) which just goes to show&#8230;</p>
<p>And thanks for telling me that apparently in Switzerland red is associated with the right&#8230; I honestly didn&#8217;t notice and here I was thinking I am a politcally interested Swiss&#8230; For me, red associates more closely with communism and socialism and therefore the left. Especially as our Social Democratic Party is almost truly socialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
