<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Is Beautiful &#187; Skeptics vs Believers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/category/skeptics-vs-believers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net</link>
	<description>Ideas, issues, knowledge, data - visualized!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:30:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change: A Consensus Among Scientists?</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/climate-change-a-consensus-among-scientists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/climate-change-a-consensus-among-scientists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Visualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[De-Hyping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeptics vs Believers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthropgenic climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dataviz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McCandless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helen Lawson Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoBeautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infodesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Is Beautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man made climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCandless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skeptics vs the believers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Visual Miscellaneum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual miscellaneum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off the back of the recent Climate Skeptics vs The Consensus image, we were curious how many scientists might make up &#8216;The Consensus&#8217;. The Skeptical side claims at least 31,486 dissenters in their ranks, according to the PetitionProject.org. That sounds like a lot. But is it? Of course, not all 12 million US scientists therefore [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off the back of the recent <a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/">Climate Skeptics vs The Consensus image</a>, we were curious how many scientists might make up &#8216;The Consensus&#8217;. </p>
<p>The Skeptical side claims at least 31,486 dissenters in their ranks, according to the <a href="http://www.petitionProject.org" rel="nofollow">PetitionProject.org</a>. That sounds like a lot. But is it?</p>
<p><img src="http://infobeautiful2.s3.amazonaws.com/climate_consensus_550.gif" alt="Climate Change: A Consensus Among Scientists?" /><br />
<strong>Of course, not all 12 million US scientists therefore agree with &#8216;The Consensus&#8217;. But this puts the PetitionProject&#8217;s 31,486 signatories in some kind of context.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-975"></span></p>
<p>Our maths here is somewhat coarse. Some better data suggests the &#8216;consensus&#8217; figure is around 97.5% of publishing climatologists and around 90% of all publishing scientists supporting the human-induced climate theory. See <a href="http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf">this study for more details</a> (PDF &#8211; Doran And Zimmerman 2009)</p>
<p>Actually, here&#8217;s how some of it looks:</p>
<p><img src="http://infobeautiful2.s3.amazonaws.com/climate_consensus_550_3.gif" alt="Climate Change: A Consensus Among Scientists 2" /></p>
<h1>Skeptical Field</h1>
<p>Among the climate skeptic scientists, we wondered which fields of science were most represented. We expected climate and earth sciences. But we got&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://infobeautiful2.s3.amazonaws.com/climate_consensus_550_2.gif" alt="Climate Consensus: Breakdown of skeptical scientists by field" /></p>
<p>In fact, when you adjust the PetitionProject&#8217;s odd categorisation &#8211; they filed &#8216;chemical engineers&#8217; as chemists and physical engineers as &#8216;physicists&#8217; &#8211; the total number of engineers who signed the petition, by our reckoning, jumps to <strong>49%</strong></p>
<p><strong>Why so many engineers?</strong></p>
<hr /><strong>UPDATE 1:</strong> 23rd Dec 09. Thanks all for the excellent feedback (and barbs!). The language and presentation have been adapted now to hopefully better reflect our exploratory intentions. </p>
<div class="source">
<hr />
:: Research by Helen Lawson Williams<br />
:: source <a href="http://www.petitionproject.org">The Petition Project</a>, <a href="http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/education/sipp2004w2.html">US Census Bureau</a> &#8211; Data on <a href="http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/sipp2004/tab3C.xls">Science Degrees</a> (Excel) &#038; <a href="http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/education/sipp2004/tab3D.xls">Advanced Science Degrees</a> (Excel)<br />
:: You can find all our data <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Aqe2P9sYhZ2ndHNIY0pnMzFqWW96c3U3cUhXRmhpR1E&#038;hl=en_GB">in this spreadsheet.</a>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-top: 2px; margin-right: 4px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationisbeautiful.net%2F2009%2Fclimate-change-a-consensus-among-scientists%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationisbeautiful.net%2F2009%2Fclimate-change-a-consensus-among-scientists%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/climate-change-a-consensus-among-scientists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Climate Deniers vs The Consensus</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/the-climate-deniers-vs-the-consensus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/the-climate-deniers-vs-the-consensus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison Chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Visualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeptics vs Believers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Visual Miscellaneum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X vs Y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climategate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dataviz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McCandless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey stick graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoBeautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infodesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Is Beautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCandless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual miscellaneum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A visual map of the arguments for and against human-caused global climate change. Iâ€™m fascinated by climate deniers. How could anyone deny the climate change is happening? What evidence is there? Surely it&#8217;s unambiguous? Curious, I investigated the key statements made by climate denialists and sought out the counter-views, as presented by climate research scientists. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/"><img src="http://infobeautiful2.s3.amazonaws.com/climate_skeptics_550n.gif" alt="Climate Skeptics vs Climate Consensus" /></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/">A visual map of the arguments for and against human-caused global climate change</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Iâ€™m fascinated by climate deniers. How could anyone deny the climate change is happening?<br />
What evidence is there? Surely it&#8217;s unambiguous?</p>
<p>Curious, I investigated the key statements made by climate denialists and sought out the counter-views, as presented by climate research scientists. The result is <a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/">this image</a>. </p>
<p>(This a new and updated version of the spread on Climate Skepticism from my book <a href="http://www.harpercollins.com/book/pre-order.aspx?isbn13=9780061748363">The Visual Miscellaneum</a>)</p>
<h1>Method</h1>
<p>I researched this subject in a very particular way. I deliberately chose not speak directly to any climate experts or leading scientists in the field. I used only publicly available web sources.  </p>
<p>Why? Because I wanted to simulate what itâ€™s like for people trying to learn about climate change online.</p>
<p>My conclusion is &#8220;what a nightmare&#8221;. I was generally shocked and appalled by how difficult it was to source counter arguments. The data was often tucked away on extremely ancient or byzantine websites. The key counter arguments I often found, 16 scrolls down, on comment 342 on a far flung realclimate.org post from three years ago. And even when I found an answer, the answers were excessively jargonized or technical.</p>
<p>Most of the info for this image is sourced from <a href="http://www.realclimate.org">Realclimate.org.</a> Itâ€™s an amazing blog staffed tirelessly by some of the worldâ€™s leading climatologists.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the majority of the writing on there is so scientific and so technical, it makes the website nigh on useless to the casual, curious reader.</p>
<p>This has got to be one of the reasons why scientists and leaders are struggling to convince sections of the populace that the threat of climate change is real. <em>Because theyâ€™re doing such a terrible job explaining it.</em> </p>
<p>(Saying all that, I would like to express my gratitude to <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/gavin-schmidt/">Gavin A Schmidt</a>, one of unsung heroes of the web IMHO. His sterling and patient replies to comments, on <a href="<a href="http://www.realclimate.org">RealClimate.org</a> in understandable English, have really helped this process.)</p>
<h1>Runaway Feedback</h1>
<p>This image was a mammoth undertaking, especially for someone like me, unschooled in climate science. So I appreciate your understanding if any errors have crept into the process. If you spot any, please get in touch and Iâ€™ll will correct them on the double.</p>
<p>In every case, wherever possible, I went back the original data. (Iâ€™ve included a<a href="http://infobeautiful.s3.amazonaws.com/infobeautiful_climatedata.zip"> ZIP of all the data Iâ€™ve collected</a> plus <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AmCeWwNKr6FmdHZEU01JSGdMUFk4bVJvNEVJR2IyLUE&#038;hl=en_GB">a spreadsheet of all the sources</a>). And all the graphs in the image are generated from the original temperature records and other data sources. Feel free to rifle through and check everything.</p>
<p>RealClimate.org are (now) keeping an archive of all the data &#8211; if you want even more!<br />
<a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/</a></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 1 (12th Dec 09):</strong> There have been a few complaints about the legibility of the image. So I&#8217;ve created a <a href="http://infobeautiful.s3.amazonaws.com/climate_skeptics_960w.gif">version on white instead of black</a>.</p>
<hr />
<div class="source">
Climate Skeptical Sources: <a href="http:///icecap.us/images/uploads/200705-03AusIMMcorrected.pdf">The Myth Of Human-Caused Climate Change (RM Carter)</a>,<a href="http://www.iarc.uaf.edu/highlights/2007/akasofu_3_07/Earth_recovering_from_LIA_R.pdf"> Is The Earth Still Recovering From A Little Ice Age (Syun-Ichi Akasofu )</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Deniers-Renowned-Scientists-Political-Persecution/dp/0980076315">The Deniers, Laurence Solomon</a></p>
<p>Consensus sources: <a href="http://www.realclimate.org">Realclimate.org</a>, <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/">NOAA Satellite and Information Service</a>, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7273/full/462545a.html">Nature.com</a>, <a href="http://cdiac.ornl.gov/">Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Centre</a></p>
<p>Explore the sources In <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AmCeWwNKr6FmdHZEU01JSGdMUFk4bVJvNEVJR2IyLUE&#038;hl=en_GB">this Google doc</a><br />
Here&#8217;s <a href="http://infobeautiful.s3.amazonaws.com/infobeautiful_climatedata.zip">all the climate change data</a> I used to create the graphs
</div>
<p></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-top: 2px; margin-right: 4px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationisbeautiful.net%2F2009%2Fthe-climate-deniers-vs-the-consensus%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationisbeautiful.net%2F2009%2Fthe-climate-deniers-vs-the-consensus%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/the-climate-deniers-vs-the-consensus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>237</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012: The End Of The World?</title>
		<link>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/2012-the-end-of-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/2012-the-end-of-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[De-Hyping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esoteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group MInd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeptics vs Believers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Visualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dataviz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David McCandless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of the world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geomagentic reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunab ku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoBeautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infodesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Is Beautiful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayan prophecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCandless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Scare Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pole shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scare stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Visual Miscellaneum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual miscellaneum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A piece exploring the myths around 2012, Mayan Prophecy, geomagnetic reversal, The Long Count, consciousness shifts, Hunab Ku, galactica alignment, the Precession Of The Equinoxes, rogue planet Nibiru, solar storms, pole shifts, timewave zero, the return of Quetzalcoatl and THE END OF THE WORLD December 21st 2012! Make up your own mind UPDATE 1 (8 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/2012-the-end-of-the-world/"><img src="http://infobeautiful2.s3.amazonaws.com/2012_550.gif" alt="2012: The End Of The World? by David McCandless, InformationIsBeautiful.net" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/2012-the-end-of-the-world">A piece exploring the myths</a> around 2012, Mayan Prophecy, geomagnetic reversal, The Long Count, consciousness shifts, Hunab Ku, galactica alignment, the Precession Of The Equinoxes, rogue planet Nibiru, solar storms, pole shifts, timewave zero, the return of Quetzalcoatl and THE END OF THE WORLD December 21st 2012!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/2012-the-end-of-the-world/">Make up your own mind</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 1 (8 Dec 09): </strong>There&#8217;s <a href="http://bioworm.org/2012">now a Portuguese version of 2012 </a>(thanks Ricardo Vieira) and <a href="http://www.la-fin-du-monde.fr/2009/12/le-poster-du-21-decembre-2012/">a French version</a> DEUUUUXMIIIILLEDOUUUUZE (thanks to Olivier!)</p>
<hr />
<div class="source">
Skeptical Sources: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon">Wikipedia</a>,<a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5geddMD9F2E4JN9acD5IJvqHtll9AD9B8P09G0"> Associated Press</a>, <a href="http://www.astro.uu.nl/~strous/AA/en/2012.html">Astronomical Answers: University of Utrecht</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01/magazine/01world-t.html?pagewanted=5&#038;_r=1">The New York Times</a>, <a href="http://2012.tribe.net/thread/fb0eedeb-124b-4b1a-a93b-bd167201e98e">John Hoopes on Tribe.Net</a>, <a href="http://www.csicop.org/si/show/myth_of_nibiru_and_the_end_of_the_world_in_2012/">Skeptical Inquirer</a>, <a href="http://gsabulletin.gsapubs.org/content/118/9-10/1099">GSA Bulletin</a>, <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/29may_noaaprediction.htm">NASA</a>, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v316/n6030/abs/316706a0.html">Nature</a></p>
<p>Believer sources: <a href="http://frequency23.net/timewave/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=26&#038;Itemid=115">Timewave Zero</a>, <a href="http://www.diagnosis2012.co.uk/">2012: Dire Gnosis</a>, <a href="http://www.realitysandwich.com/">RealitySandwich.com</a>, <a href="http://www.2012thebook.com/">2012:TheBook</a>, <a href="http://www.calleman.com/">Calleman.com</a>, <a href="http://www.instituteforhumancontinuity.org/">Institute For Human Continuity</a> (fake website for 2012 film).</p>
<p>Explore the sources In <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AmCeWwNKr6FmdDJnMmtSY3JGZF9GNlUzRTN6SEMyNWc&#038;hl=en">this Google doc</a>
</div>
<p></p>
<hr />
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-top: 2px; margin-right: 4px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationisbeautiful.net%2F2009%2F2012-the-end-of-the-world%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationisbeautiful.net%2F2009%2F2012-the-end-of-the-world%2F&amp;style=compact&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/2009/2012-the-end-of-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
